Editorial policy

Bright Stadium Review aims to explain stadium design accurately and plainly. We distinguish description from interpretation, make uncertainty clear and correct published errors when they are brought to our attention.

Accuracy and context

We check names, design terms and factual statements against appropriate material before publication. Articles should give enough context for readers to understand what a design choice does, while avoiding unsupported claims about how every spectator will experience it. We do not present general observations as technical assessments of a particular structure.

Independence

Editorial choices are made for their relevance to readers, not as a promise of favourable coverage. Partnerships do not determine the conclusions of editorial articles. We identify material that has been paid for, supplied or otherwise created as a collaboration so readers can recognise its nature.

Corrections

If a published article contains an error, contact us through the Contact page and describe the passage and the correction you believe is needed. We review correction requests, update material when warranted and make the nature of a significant change clear to readers.

Images and generated illustrations

Images are chosen to support the subject and should not be taken as proof of a design claim. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; when used, they are labelled as illustrations and are not presented as documentary photographs.